25 Şubat 2013 Pazartesi

The Generation Gasp, February 23, 2013

To contact us Click HERE
A platter of horse meat served at Kishlak, an ...
A platter of horse meat served at Kishlak, an Uzbek restaurant in Kazakhstan. The horse meat was served cold. There are three types on the platter: tripe on the left, roasted in the middle, and sausage on the right. The roasted meat tasted no different than roast beef. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
A Horse of A different Color

Saturday, February 23, 2013
By CLAIRE AND JIM CASTAGNERA tneditor@tnonline.comClaire:Recently, the food company Nestle and grocery stores in the U.K. were forced to recall much of their meat and meat-containing meals. The reason? The meat was labeled "beef," but actually contained large percentages of horsemeat. Some as much as 100 percent. Sure, some people eat horsemeat on purpose, but other people are less enthused about the surprise in their mystery meat.My first reaction was visceral - the poor horses! After all, I've ridden horses since I was eight; I tend to think of them as pets, even friends, but not food. But that doesn't change the fact that people around the world enjoy horsemeat, just as some cultures consider dog meat a part of their traditional cuisine. There's also the fact that the horse meat wasn't detected until Irish food safety authorities randomly tested a range of supermarket beef products and found pork and horse DNA present in most products. In other words, no one complained about funky-tasting meat, and so one must wonder if anyone would've figured it out otherwise. Which brings me to: is it really such a big deal?Well, yes, of course it is. We all want to know that the ingredients listed in our food are the ingredients we're actually consuming. But I think that's what this scandal has brought to light: all too often we don't know what we're eating. In this day and age, so many of the ingredients listed on the side of the container range from indecipherable to meaningless… something we like to blissfully ignore until an incident like this makes us think a little too hard.Because is it really that much more distasteful to eat a horse than, say, a cow? I would hazard to guess the answer is "no," if you take the time to think about it. But most of us - myself included - would rather continue eating in ignorance than delve into that can of worms.Jim:The Chinese have a saying: "We eat everything that flies, except airplanes; we eat everything in the water, except boats; and, we eat everything that moves on the land, except cars." On my several trips to China, I've eaten sea slugs (think snot), duck tongues (quack, quack), and a whole, pickled quail (everything but the beak).In Mexico, I've had bulls' cojones. I've tried tripe soup in a Polish restaurant in Trenton and snails in any number of French and Italian restaurants. Even these culinary adventures pale, however, compared to cutting edge gourmets who consume poisonous puffer fish and live octopi. Eating monkey brains is another exotic practice, though my limited research reveals that the eating of live-monkey brains is an urban legend.Alligator, ostrich and kangaroo steaks are mundane by comparison. All are raised and eaten around the world. Likewise carp and eels.At the end of the day, the Chinese aren't unique in their openness to unusual eats. The rub, as Claire rightly observes, is keeping the contents confidential. Almost as bad in my book is providing a chemistry set's inventory of chemicals on the back of the wrapper. How am I helped by being told the product I'm about to eat contains methylcyclopropene, aspartame, astaxanthin, benzoic acid, butylated hydroxyanisole, or canthaxathin? (You can look all these up athttp://phys.org/news183110037.html)At least - to the best of my knowledge - we don't eat one another. I recall a 1973 sci-fi film called "Soylent Green," in which Charlton Heston plays a cop in an overcrowded future world, who discovers that the latest high-protein bars on offer to the masses are recycled corpses.Enter any American supermarket to see how far from that horror we are. Imagine how some Stone Age cannibal would react the cornucopia we take for granted. I can live with a little deception as a fair trade off.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Once more into the breach: from the sublime to the mundane

To contact us Click HERE
Ten baby products that are harmful when misused:

http://www.newborncare.com/blog/10-baby-products-that-can-cause-injuries-because-of-misuse/


  • My HONEST opinion of Honest Baby Products!
  • Study Finds Flame Retardants in 80% of Baby Products
  • The Toxic Truth behind Mass-Produced Baby Bedding
  • Ensure your baby's safety at home
  • A Letter to My Pregnant Child-less Self
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thought for the day... from a dear colleague

To contact us Click HERE
English: Thomas Hobbes Македон�ки: Тома� Хоб�
English: Thomas Hobbes Македон�ки: Тома� Хоб� (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
"Change is caused by lazy, greedy, frightened people looking for easier, more profitable, and safer ways to do things."

This is from an article in the Chronicle about historian Ian Morris.
http://chronicle.com/article/In-Ian-Morriss-Big-History/137415/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en

Like Hobbes's "nasty, brutish, and short," those Limeys sure have a way with words.
Tim


  • A Comparative Peace Oriented Social Contracts
  • "An Animal": Human Behavior, Labels, and Governance
  • The Leviathan Shows Its Teeth
  • On happiness [Stoat]
Enhanced by Zemanta

Deferred Action for Certain Young Immigrants: Don't Get Scammed

To contact us Click HERE
On June 15, 2012, DHS announced that certain young people who entered the US before age 16 will no longer be removed from the United States. Qualifying individuals will be granted "deferred action" and be eligible for a work permit.
In order to be eligible for deferred action an individual must prove that he or she: 
  1. Was under 31 years old on June 15, 2012
  2. Came to the United States at the age of 16
  3. Has continuously resided in the United States for at least 5 years before June 15, 2012, and was physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012.
  4. Is currently attending school, has graduated from high school, has obtained a G.E.D. certificate or is an honorably discharged veteran of the US Armed Forces or Coast Guard.
  5. Has not been convicted of a felony offense,significant misdemeanor offense, multiple misdemeanor offenses, or otherwise possessed a threat to the community or national security.
The government will inform the public how to apply within 60 days or by August 13, 2012. Until then anyone CANNOT APPLY for deferred action. You should not turn yourself in to start the process. 

However, you can begin gathering the documents that you will need.
  1. Documents such as birth certificate or passport, showing age on June 15, 2012;
  2. Financial records, medical records, school records, employment records, and military records that demonstrate an individual came to the US before the age of 16, and resides in the US for at least five years preceding June 15, 2012 and was physically present in the US as of June 15, 2012;
  3. School records, including diplomas, G.E.D. certificates, report cards, school transcripts and other evidence of enrollment, or documentation as an honorably discharged veteran of the US Armed Forces or Coast Guard.
Request for deferred action will be  reviewed on a case to case basis, and not every young immigrant are qualify.
Source: AILA 
If you have any questions or need assistance with your immigration matter,
please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Sharlene Mae Bagon, Esq.
BAGON LAW FIRM
6700 Fallbrook Avenue
Suite 125H
West Hills, CA 91307
Toll Free: (888) 992-2466
Main Tel.: (818) 539-0120
Fax: (888) 589-0804
www.bagonlawfirm.com

Supreme Court Ruling on SB 1070, Arizona's Immigration Law

To contact us Click HERE
On Monday, June 25, 2012, the US Supreme Court upheld the main provision of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants but threw out three other parts. 
These three provisions required immigrants to carry immigration papers at all times, banned illegal immigrants from soliciting work in public places, and requires state law enforcement officials to determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest if they have reason to suspect that the individual might be in the country illegally. 
Though the court gave the go-ahead to a key provision of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants, it also warned that people could not be held for extended periods for not having proper immigration papers.
In their ruling, the justices said the federal government had the ultimate authority to decide who would be held on immigration charges and possibly deported. Arizona police officers must also check with federal immigration agents before deciding to hold any suspects, the court ruled. Federal immigration officials in Arizona were instructed by the Department of Homeland Security  not to respond to traffic stops or similar law enforcement encounters unless the person in custody was a convicted criminal, had been removed from the U.S. previously and reentered illegally or was a recent border crosser. They will, however, respond to telephone requests from local law enforcement to verify a detainee's immigration status.
Arizona became the first of half a dozen U.S. states to adopt laws to drive illegal immigrants out. About 360,000 of the country's illegal immigrants, or 3 percent, reside in Arizona. Most of the state's nearly 2 million Hispanics are in the country legally.  Arizona borders Mexico, where the foreign ministry issued a statement assailing the high political costs it said were attached to such laws and voicing concern for the civil rights of Mexicans living in or visiting U.S. states with such laws.
Last year, the court upheld a different Arizona law that penalizes businesses for hiring illegal immigrants.
Source: NY Times, LA Times, Reuters
If you have any questions or need assistance with your immigration matter,
please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Sharlene Mae Bagon, Esq.
BAGON LAW FIRM
6700 Fallbrook Avenue
Suite 125H
West Hills, CA 91307
Toll Free: (888) 992-2466
Main Tel.: (818) 539-0120
Fax: (888) 589-0804
www.bagonlawfirm.com

24 Şubat 2013 Pazar

A Third Palestinian Intifada?

To contact us Click HERE
The Coat of arms of the Palestinian National A...
The Coat of arms of the Palestinian National Authority (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
The fear of a Third Palestinian Intifada and what we can learn from the Second Intifada

During the last days major demonstrations took place across the West Bank in solidarity with Palestinian hunger-strikers and prisoners, with many Palestinian civilians wounded in the clashes with IDF forces. There are presently four Palestinian prisoners on long-term hunger strike and their plight have struck an emotional chord with Palestinians. Palestinian politician and activist Mustafa Barghouti warned that a Third Intifada would break out “if anything happens to the prisoners” (Bikya News, February 21, 2013).

According to Haaretz, the events in the West Bank “have brought Israel and the Palestinians closer to the boiling point than they have been in many years.” “For the first time since 2007, it seems that the Palestinian Authority (PA) has an interest in making waves, even if the leadership in Ramallah does not want to see long-term bloody clashes.” The reasons cited by the Israeli daily for PA’s position: diverting attention away from its failure to reach a reconciliation agreement with Hamas; worsening economic situation and the hope Israel could persuade the Arab world to renew donations to the PA; the upcoming visit by U.S. President Barack Obama to the region and the hope to persuade the administration to re-engage in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks (Amos Harel, Haaretz, Feb.24, 2013).

On this background see the article by Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi “The Palestinian Authority’s Responsibility for the Outbreak of the Second Intifada: Its Own Damning Testimony,” published by  the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs at:

http://jcpa.org/article/the-palestinian-authoritys-responsibility-for-the-outbreak-of-the-second-intifada-its-own-damning-testimony/

I agree with Halevi’s conclusion that contrary to the claim made on February 11, 2013, on Israel’s Channel 10 television program “The Source” that there was not even an “iota of evidence” that the Palestinian Authority leadership, and Yasser Arafat in particular, planned and initiated the Second Intifada, which resulted in the deaths of more than 1,000 Israelis by 2005, the final decision to initiate the Second Intifada was indeed made by Yasser Arafat immediately upon the conclusion of the second Camp David summit, which ended on July 25, 2000.

See also my old article on the same subject “The Role of Terrorism in the Breakdown of the Israeli - Palestinian Peace Process, “published by ICT in May 2003, at the height of the Second Intifada at:
http://www.ict.org.il/Articles/tabid/66/Articlsid/104/currentpage/25/Default.aspx

Halevi cites Marwan Barghouti [one of the intifada’s most prominent Fatah leaders imprisoned in Israel for his direct responsibility in the killing of five Israelis], who presented a revealing statement (Akhbar Al-Khalil, March 8, 2000) on the strategy of the Fatah movement at the beginning of 2000:

“Whoever believes that one can reach a decision on the issues of a permanent agreement [with Israel] – for example, on refugees, Jerusalem, settlements, and borders – via negotiation is living under an illusion. On these matters we have to wage a battle on the ground in parallel to the negotiating framework….I mean a conflict.”

The question today is if the President of the PA, Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), will choose in the end the path of violence to which he was opposed until now, or he will lose control of the situation, after he encouraged the first stages of popular violence.

In an interview with the official website of the Hamas movement (palestine-info.info) in October 2010, cited in Halevi’s article, Mahmoud Al-Zahar, one of Hamas’ senior leaders, was asked if it can be expected that Abu Mazen will reach a stage in his conduct similar to the one of Yasser Arafat at his time, who “ instructed Hamas to carry out terror attacks while he was besieged in Ramallah.”

Mahmoud Al-Zahar answered that “Abu Mazen has neither the courage nor the vision, and he is incapable of betting his life on such an issue.”

It remains to be seen if Al-Zahar’s evaluation was right, in which case the possible transformation of the present violent demonstrations into a bloody Third Intifada could be the result of PA’s leadership losing control of the situation or if Hamas succeeds to thrust it in this trap by a wave of deadly bombings.


Ely Karmon, Ph.D.
Senior Research Scholar
International Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) and
The Institute for Policy and Strategy (IPS) at
The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC)
Herzlyia, Israel
Tel.:   972-9-9527277
Cell.: 972-52-2653306
Fax.: 972-9-9513073, 972-9-7716653
E-mail: ekarmon@idc.ac.il
Web: http://www.ict.org.il/



  • 'Third intifada' is already here, PA officials say
  • Rajoub: We Won't Initiate 3rd Intifada
  • 'Palestinian Authority' increasing violence ahead of Obama visit
  • 18 attempts in four months to kidnap Israeli soldiers
  • Palestinian inmates on hunger strike
Enhanced by Zemanta

A lockdown at MIT yesterday

To contact us Click HERE
English: A Ford Cambridge Police Department, p...
English: A Ford Cambridge Police Department, patrol car from the side-view. (older design) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The MIT campus was placed on lockdown Saturday morning following a report from the Cambridge Police that there was a man with...
To continue reading this breaking news, use the following link:
http://facultyrow.com/profiles/blogs/breaking-news-mit-campus-on-lockdown
You may check the status of this story throughout the day, on FacultyRow.com's homepage.
-The FacultyRow Team
Visit FacultyRow at: http://facultyrow.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network 
Enhanced by Zemanta